BRL Hardy Australian Wine Company Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the BRL Hardy Australian Wine Company. Answer: Marketingroles and responsibilities include managing themarketing activities of the company and developing strategies as per the company objectives. In this particular case the global brand strategy of BRL Hardy, an Australian wine company has been considered. The Australian wine industry had gone a lot of changes within few years. Therefore the company had to think carefully about the marketing pattern carefully in order to pursue a global brand strategy. As innovation is an important part of marketing therefore fortified wines became obsolete and vineyards were substituted by varieties of table wine. The changes in the wine industry were responsible for affecting the upcoming wine companies in Australia. That is why in order to pursue global brand strategy it becomes essential to practice responsive, future- proof, resilient and growth- oriented management. In order to ensure that the brand functions properly on a global context adaptability and flexibility are important. Philips is one of those brands which became successful by maintaining balance and thus made a big impact in the Chinese market. It is also important to adapt to the solutions based on technology as it is considered as the best benefit of brand management. If consistency, is maintained in the identity and marketing strategy of brand then it acts as a strategic guide. For instance, Unilever has made use of Percolate, a marketing software company for supporting global brand management practices. By modifying the structure of the organization and working actively global brand management can be improved. Initially the BRL Hardy Company was at the top of Australian wine selling companies and Carson, the managing director always felt proud about the situation. But the condition became different when he had to decide between the future strategies of the company and the implications on the international functions. This became a matter of concern for both Carson and Davies. In addition to that company managers had to decide on two competitive proposals for making new entry in the Australian wine market. Stephen Davies was appointed as a marketing manager of the BRL Hardy Company to evaluate the global operations. In doing so he found that the international operations were not at a very good stage, rather poor. This became a matter of tension for him and he started to think of ways by which this difference can be sorted. He made Quality Wines for the World the slogan of the company to build the perfect export strategy based on a premium quality of brand image. When both of these persons were in anxiety to save the company from distress Millar, the managing director of the parent company came to their rescue. He was the one who wanted Carson to be involved in this matter. Along with that he also wanted to make sure that the European activities are aligned with the strong and new strategies of the company so that they can remain in the top position in the market. In this way he did not even want to endanger the position of this company in the market as it was responsible for two- third of the export sales. Among the two proposal files that led Carson and Davies to worry about the future of the company, one of the files contained the proposed launch of Distinto, a new line of Italian wines. These were developed after collaborating with a Sicilian winery. It can be suggested that BRL Hardy should not launch Distinto in the UK even though Carson and his team was deeply involved in this project. This is because there was quite a lot of controversy among the Australian management. They were concerned about Mapocho which was another business sourcing pact. It was battling at that point to make a proper marketing launch and make the weakening relation with Chilean sourcing associate better. In such a critical situation it will not be a wise decision to ignore either of the two projects. The plan behind launching Distinto is to build an amazing image for it in the Mediterranean lifestyle. However it would not have been possible if the concentration of the managers is shifted to Mapocho. Thus one of the two projects needed to be compromised for the sake of the other. Since Mapocho was already launched in the market therefore it deserved better treatment than Distinto which was yet to be launched. Moreover, even though the idea of this Italian wine was appreciated but many questions were raised before its approval. The management had negative feeling about this particular brand because of previous ventures gone badly. There was an issue in deciding between the managers of the company whether to launch Banrock Station in the UK. The UK based management had become successful in developing a reasonable amount of commitment to Kellys Revenge. It was a brand that was built up to react to the UK market opportunity. On the other hand the parent company was more concerned about the promotion of Banrock Station because this product was successfully launched in Australia before and that is why they wanted to continue it as an international brand without modifying the price level. The company should launch Banrock station in the UK because it was positioned in the market as an environmental- friendly product where the profits were partly allocated to the conservation groups. If it would be launched in the UK then the price would be kept similar to that of Kellys Revenge. The product would be considered as an instant success for the Australian market and tends to be the largest selling imported brand in New Zealand. Moreover, the Banrock Station should be launched in UK because Davis and Millar were convinced of the potential of this brand at an international level. They also convinced the BRL Hardy companies in other places such as Europe and North America to put their best efforts behind it. It was accepted by Canadian managed to be launched immediately because they had foreseen the benefits behind it. The ample benefits that were being received from this brand should not be overlooked. There was a constant issue between the launching of Kellys Revenge on one hand by the UK management and Banrock station on the other hand by the parent company. It can be suggested that Kellys Revenge should not be launched in UK. As it has been discussed in the report that Banrock Station will also be launched in the same price level of Kellys Revenge to succeed in the new market. Moreover, Banrock Station was also a potentially global brand and Davies and Millar was convinced by that. Kellys revenge could stand nowhere in front of its competing brand. Millar added to this explanation that when Kellys Revenge was taken to UK, it failed to appeal to the marketers. Instead, Banrock Station was successful in getting compliments in the UK market. This was counted as a great opportunity for positioning the brand in the UK market. Therefore it will be a great decision to stop the launch of Kellys Revenge in the UK market because nobody would like to put the companys reputation at stake. Banrock Station was already successful in appealing to the consumers in its production stage because of its conservation efforts. That is how the company could gain its reputation as a potential global brand. Bibliography Bartlett, C.A., 2001.BRL Hardy: Globalizing an Australian Wine Company. Harvard Business School Pub.. Bianchi, C., 2015. Consumer brand loyalty in the Chilean wine industry.Journal of Food Products Marketing,21(4), pp.442-460. Bianchi, C., Drennan, J. and Proud, B., 2014. Antecedents of consumer brand loyalty in the Australian wine industry.Journal of wine research,25(2), pp.91-104. Carsana, L. and Jolibert, A., 2017. The effects of expertise and brand schematicity on the perceived importance of choice criteria: a Bordeaux wine investigation.Journal of Product Brand Management,26(1), pp.80-90. Ertimur, B. and Coskuner-Balli, G., 2015. Navigating the institutional logics of markets: Implications for strategic brand management.Journal of Marketing,79(2), pp.40-61. Fleming, A., Park, S.E. and Marshall, N.A., 2015. Enhancing adaptation outcomes for transformation: climate change in the Australian wine industry.Journal of wine research,26(2), pp.99-114. Gmez, M., Lopez, C. and Molina, A., 2015. A model of tourism destination brand equity: The case of wine tourism destinations in Spain.Tourism Management,51, pp.210-222. Logan, S., 2016. Wine and viticulture journal marks 30 years.Wine Viticulture Journal,31(3), p.7. Rowley, M., 2017. Supply and demand: Supply and demand dynamics for Australian wine following vintage 2016.Wine Viticulture Journal,32(3), p.58. Saltman, Y., Johnson, T., Wilkinson, K. and Bastian, S., 2015. Australian wine consumers acceptance of and attitudes toward the use of additives in wine and food production.